[UPDATE- November 2019] You can find the newest Get Started with Appium white papers here: Get Started with Appium- Java and Get Started with Appium- Ruby
This is the fourth post in a series called Appium Bootcamp by noted Selenium expert Dave Haeffner.
Dave recently immersed himself in the open source Appium project and collaborated with leading Appium contributor Matthew Edwards to bring us this material. Appium Bootcamp is for those who are brand new to mobile test automation with Appium. No familiarity with Selenium is required, although it may be useful. This is the fourth of eight posts; two new posts will be released each week.
There are a good deal of similarities between Selenium and Appium tests. We will be using similar actions (like click) along with some kind of wait mechanism (e.g., an explicit wait) to make our tests more resilient. There will also be an assertion used to determine if our actions were successful or not.
In order to put these concepts to work, let's consider the basic structure of the test apps we've been working with. They are straightforward in that they both have text elements that, when clicked, take you to a dedicated page for that element (e.g., Accessibility triggers the Accessibility page). Let's step through our first set of test actions (in the console) that we'll use to automate this behavior; verifying that each element brings us to the correct page.
Let's dig in with some examples.
An iOS Example
The behavior of our app can be easily mapped to test actions by first using a text match to find the element we want, and clicking it. We can then make sure we are in the right place by performing another text match (this time an exact text match). When we wire this up to our test framework, this match will be responsible for passing or failing the test. More on that in the next post.
text('Buttons, Various uses of UIButton').click
text_exact 'Buttons'
The only problem with this approach is that it is not resilient. The global wait for each test action (a.k.a. an implicit wait) is set to 0 seconds by default. So if there is any delay in the app, the test action will not complete and throw an element not found exception instead.
To overcome these timing problems we can employ an explicit wait around our test actions (both the click and the exact text match). This is simple enough to do with the wait command.
wait { text('Buttons, Various uses of UIButton').click }
wait { text_exact 'Buttons' }
These test actions are resilient now, but they're inflexible since we were using statically coded values. Let's fix that by using dynamic values instead.
cell_1 = wait { text 2 }
cell_title = cell_1.name.split(',').first
wait { cell_1.click }
wait { text_exact cell_title }
Now we're finding the first text by it's index. Index 2 contains the first element (a.k.a. a cell), whereas index 1 is the table header. After that, we're extracting the name and dynamically finding the title. Now our test will continue to work if there are any text changes.
This is good, but now let's expand things to cover the rest of the app.
cell_names = tags('UIATableCell').map { |cell| cell.name }
cell_names.each do |name|
wait { text_exact(name).click }
wait { text_exact name.split(',').first }
wait { back }
end
We first grab the names of each clickable cell, storing them in a collection. We then iterate through the collection, finding each element by name, clicking it, performing an exact match on the resulting page, and then going back to the main screen. This is repeated until each cell is verified.
This works for cells that are off the screen (e.g., out of view) since Appium will scroll them into view before taking an action against them.
An Android Example
Things are pretty similar to the iOS example. We perform a text match, click action, and exact text match.
text('Accessibility').click
text_exact 'Accessibility Node Provider'
We then make things resilient by wrapping them in an explicit wait.
wait { text('Accessibility').click }
wait { text_exact 'Accessibility Node Provider' }
We then make our selection more flexible by upgrading to dynamic values.
cell_1 = wait { text 2 }
wait { cell_1.click }
wait { find_exact 'Accessibility Node Provider' }
We then expand things to exercise the whole app by collecting all of the clickable elements and iterating through them.
cell_names = tags('android.widget.TextView').map { |cell| cell.name }
cell_names[1..-1].each do |cell_name|
wait { scroll_to_exact(cell_name).click }
wait_true { ! exists { find_exact cell_name } }
wait { back }
wait { find_exact('Accessibility'); find_exact('Animation') }
end
A few things to note.
The first item in the cell_names collection is a header. To discard it, we use cell_name[1..-1] which basically says start with the second item in the collection (e.g., [1) and continue (e.g., ..) all the way until the end (e.g.,-1]).
In order to interact with cells that are off the screen, we will need to use the scroll_to_exact command, and perform a click against that (instead of a text match).
Since each sub-screen doesn't have many unique attributes for us to verify against, we can at the very least verify that we're no longer on the home screen. After that, we verify that we are brought back to the home screen.
Outro
Now that we have our test actions sussed out, we're ready to commit them to code and plug them into a test runner.
About Dave Haeffner: Dave is a recent Appium convert and the author of Elemental Selenium (a free, once weekly Selenium tip newsletter that is read by thousands of testing professionals) as well as The Selenium Guidebook (a step-by-step guide on how to use Selenium Successfully). He is also the creator and maintainer of ChemistryKit (an open-source Selenium framework). He has helped numerous companies successfully implement automated acceptance testing; including The Motley Fool, ManTech International, Sittercity, and Animoto. He is a founder and co-organizer of the Selenium Hangout and has spoken at numerous conferences and meetups about acceptance testing.
Continue the reading the other chapters:
